LOGIN | REGISTER | MOBILE
  email: [X]
   password:
[send password]      
 subject: "05/02 : Pain trounces Chuck Norris 28-12"
autopost
gamescore

May 02, 2010
10:58 AM

;
05/02 : Pain trounces Chuck Norris 28-12

Pain improves to 3-0-1 on the season, while Chuck Norris drop to 0-4.

This is the most points scored in a game this season by PainCoupled with a win in their previous game, Pain has now won two in a row.

The loss continues a 3 game skid for Chuck Norris which now extends to 4 losses in a row. .

These teams had played each other twice prior to this matchup. Pain won both of those games. Their most recent matchup was Oct 05 2008, 08:00, a IFFL - Reston/Fairfax Fall League "B" regular season game which Pain won 39-14.

Next up for Chuck Norris is The Penetrators (2-1). That game is scheduled for May 09 2010, 08:00 at South Lakes Drive Park.

Pain will face off against Wolves (3-0) on May 09 2010, 10:00 at Hook Rd.




CN21

May 03, 2010
10:21 AM
; 
Pain got lucky. If we had our full squad, we would have rolled those punks.

Hollywood
Pain
coach


May 03, 2010
10:43 AM
; 
You`re right, we were lucky. A win is a win so we`ll take it.

LOL

May 03, 2010
12:57 PM
; 
So you didnt have a full squad the past 4 games?

Chuck Norris
coach


May 03, 2010
1:30 PM
; 
While I think "trounce" is a little harsh, I hope everyone realizes that CN21 doesn`t actually play for Chuck Norris. We log in to prevent anyone from confusing our players with idiots like that.
Good game Pain.

CN21

May 03, 2010
2:13 PM
; 
I thought I was logged in. Come on, Pain isn`t much better than us. If we had our whole team out there, we would have won.

What a msg

May 05, 2010
6:48 AM
; 
good call

CN21

May 05, 2010
1:26 PM
; 
We just need a season to adjust. Don`t worry coach, it`s all good. These guys can hate on us all they want. We will see who is in the running for the ship in the fall.

replying to this post
posting name:

are you on a team roster?
if so, then you can probably login and post with your team icon. CLICK HERE to check.
reply: